No my friend didn’t say we were going to war because of WMD, and he didn’t use the word “oil” at all. But that of course was understood. No my friend said, “We’re going into Iraq because the US wants a presence in the middle-east, for when the Saudi family falls”. Eight years ago, I don’t believe anyone outside the beltway was talking or thinking about the “Saudi family falling”.
The invasion of Iraq by US forces began with bombing, on March 18, 2003. Leading up to that moment, we had been sold a bill of goods, by the Bush Administration, about WMD. You do of course remember the ever dreadful, “Weapons of Mass Destruction”, which, with “slam dunk” certainty, were stockpiled in Iraq? We were assured that Saddam had them, that he was a very bad guy, and that the United States was in “imminent danger”. And as Jack Nicholson once told us, when asked if the “danger was imminent”, his response was-“Is there any other kind”? Well, apparently, the US was in “imminent danger”, and the new Sheriff in D.C. was going out to get that no good varmint, Saddam Hussein, and that would be that. Full speed ahead.
So here are a few things to consider while the war in Iraq continues, and is now our longest war:
1. The United States had been operating a “no-fly zone” over Iraq since 1991- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_no-fly_zones. I believe I heard or read somewhere that the annual cost was around two billion dollars a year, but it appeared to be keeping Hussein & Co., in check. A BIG amount of $ for sure, but no where near what the war has cost since the invasion in 2003, and I’m not adding in the cost of stolen cash, weapons or supplies. And how do you place a price on the lives of the lost and wounded? Shouldn’t someone, somewhere be held accountable for lives lost due to the fabrication of circumstances? The bottom line- With the no-fly zone, Saddam was going no where and the threat of him actually going after the United States, Israel or any of his Arab neighbors seemed pretty remote.
2. Within days of 09/11, American Special-ops troops in Afghanistan were making a pretty good go of it with regard to hunting down Osama Bin Laden. That is of course until they were called off. Somehow, all of a sudden, the real villain was in Iraq. That Saddam Hussein sure was a really bad guy…
3. Numerous American statesmen have been in bed with the Saudis for years, before, during and after “W”. It’s not just a republican thing; this one clearly crosses party lines. Please make a mental note- 15 of the 19, 09/11 terrorists were Saudis, and hours after 9/11, Bush helped fly Bin Laden family members safely out of the US and back to their mid- east homes. Since then, any number of known, or captured terrorists has been of Saudi decent.
4. And lastly, let me suggest a book, for reading or reference:
The title, THE IRAQ WAR READER History, Documents Opinions, is edited by Micah L. Sifry and Christopher Cerf, and published by TOUCHSTONE. While referencing this book some years ago, several chapters/”Documents” caught my attention.
a. On page 199- An Open Letter To President Clinton: Remove
Saddam From Power. This letter was dated January 26, 1998, and was signed by Elliott Abrams, Richard Armitage, William J. Bennett, John Bolton, William Kristol, Richard Perle, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz, to name about half of the signators. The letter to President Clinton urged him to “implement a strategy for removing Saddam’s regime from power.” Again, the letter was dated 01-26-1998.
b. On page 222- An Open Letter To President Bush: “Lead The
World To Victory”. This letter was dated September 20, 2001 only nine days after the World Trade Center Towers fell to the ground… “We agree with Secretary of State Powell that the United States must find and punish the perpetrators of the horrific attack of September 11…” Another entry mentioned Iraq, “But even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq”. Many of those who signed the Clinton letter in 1998, (but not all) also signed this letter, dated 09-20-2001.
c. On page 243 is an article originally published in the Weekly Standard, on January 21, 2002, titled What To Do About Iraq, it was written by Robert Kagan and William Kristol. Mr. Kristol was then and remains today, the Editor of the Weekly Standard. Once again- more push about WMD, invade Iraq, oust Hussein, etc., etc., etc.
The weekly Standard is a conservative magazine and blog
I’m quite sure you get it by now- Neocons, continually pushing to go into Iraq. Well their dream came true when they got their paws/claws on “W”; they had the perfect vehicle to carry out their plan. They had young George, who might, have felt he had a lot to prove. They had a master ventriloquist in Dick Cheney and that guy can say “W M D”, through his sneer, without even moving his lips. And they had Donald “The Fog of Ego” Rumsfeld as the Secretary of Defense and a signatory to the Clinton letter (above) of 01-26-1998.
So why Iraq? Maybe it was perceived to be a quick and easy invasion because we so easily and successfully dealt with Iraq‘s military in Gulf War I, and the dangers seemed somewhat limited, especially knowing there was NO WMD! I assure you there are multiple answers to that question and none of the answers addresses accountability.
Well the Saudi family hasn’t fallen yet, but it could be in the works as the middle east, continues to rumble and tumble its way through change. I guess the best we can hope for is to keep our distance, let each country figure it out for themselves keep our guard up, and start taking care of America first, here at home.
Can you imagine how good it would be to have all those brave American men and women back home, where they belong? And wouldn’t reducing and eradicating the cost of the war(s) could bring more health, wealth and life to a struggling economy?
Only one question remains- Who has the nerve to make that happen?
Thanx as always, and peace…, bob
The bottom line…
Has anyone noticed that as Sarah Palin travels around in her vacation bus, that she makes sure to keep on moving- walking, turning around, shaking hands, greeting people, etc., etc. And her young daughter seems to even run interference for her, or at least remain close enough that Sarah can talk to her or try and engage her in the PR. Sometimes Todd is there, often her father and Sarah, well Sarah never stands still long enough to take a “serious” question. And when the time comes, if it ever does, she’ll not have a clue as to real answers to real questions, with out a wink, or a perky, slightly evasive retort,
The bottom line… Sarah Palin sure knows how to work the press, and boy, should they be embarrassed.